Fifty Years of Change, One Constant: Investing Through Innovation

by Krystal Daibes Higgins, CFA
Senior Vice President
Equity Research and Portfolio Management

Fifty years is a long time for a company to stay in business. For those in the technology industry, it’s an eternity. Entire categories have been born, scaled, and rendered obsolete in less than a decade. Business models that once seemed unassailable have been disrupted by rapid innovation and better execution. The rate of innovation has only accelerated, compressing cycles and raising the stakes for both businesses and investors 

Our own firm marked its 50-year anniversary last year, and that vantage point brings a certain perspective. While tools, sectors, and dominant companies have evolved dramatically, our investment philosophy has not. We remain focused on durability of business models, quality of management, and the long-term compounding of capital.  

Two technology firms that recently reached 50-year milestone are Apple and Microsoft. Apple, founded in 1976, belongs to a group of companies that shaped the modern era of technological transformation. At the time, technology investing was largely defined by hardware, and constrained by physical scale.  It wasn’t until the rise of software, led by companies like Microsoft, that investors began to appreciate the power of intangible assets. They provided high margins, low incremental costs and, importantly, scalability. 

The late 1990s, however, underscored how easily capital can outrun fundamentals when a new paradigm emerges, with the subsequent decades refining that learning. The most enduring technology franchises, Apple among them, proved that innovation and scale are imperative to succeed. Once left for dead in the late 1990s, Apple’s reinvention through the iPod, iPhone and ultimately its services ecosystem demonstrated a shift from product cycles to platform economics, anchoring the company’s fundamentals in a more durable way based on monthly subscriptions and company loyalty. 

This broader evolution has reshaped capital markets. Technology as a percentage of the S&P 500 is now the largest sector at over 30% and dominates the top 10 positions in the index – a dramatic change from 1975 when only IBM joined the list of mostly oil companies in ninth place.   

Investors today place greater emphasis on free cash flow generation, return on invested capital, and the strategic optionality embedded within platforms. The lens has widened from assessing a single product cycle to evaluating an ecosystem’s ability to extend into adjacent markets over time. Companies that succeed are those that continuously adapt and innovate, disrupting their own legacy before others can. 

At the same time, the pace of development has increased. Each new development, artificial intelligence being the most recent, shortens the distance between innovation and adoption. For investors, this has led to a wider dispersion of outcomes and a narrower margin for error in assessing competitive advantage. 

Through all of this, our approach has been intentional: we focus our efforts on identifying businesses with the capacity to endure through them by building structural advantages, maintaining disciplined capital allocation and retaining top talent and management teams that understand how to evolve.  

Apple and Microsoft at 50 is a reflection of that principle. Their success is not simply a function of breakthrough products, but of the ability to adapt as the landscape shifts. Capital markets, over time, have become more attuned to recognizing that kind of resilience, which is reflected in their combined $7 trillion valuation.  

The next 50 years will almost certainly bring even greater change. The challenge, as it has always been, is not just keeping pace with innovation, but maintaining the perspective to identify what is truly durable and capable of compounding investor capital over time. As we’ve seen with Apple, a lot of value can be created in 50 years. 

Takeaways for the Week 

  • Apple and Microsoft at 50 underscore the power of reinvention. Both companies have navigated multiple technological eras while continuing to grow and compound value. 

Disclosure: The views expressed represent the opinion of Ferguson Wellman. The views are subject to change and are not intended as a forecast or guarantee of future results. This material is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment. Statements of future expectations, estimates, projections and other forward-looking statements are based on available information and Ferguson Wellman’s views as of the time of these statements. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Ferguson Wellman, Octavia Group and West Bearing do not provide tax, legal, insurance or medical advice. This material has been prepared for general educational purposes only and not as a substitute for qualified counsel who can determine how this information applies to you. We believe the information provided is from reliable sources but should not be assumed accurate or complete.

Please see additional
disclosures.